Monday, July 24, 2017

Farron comments on Fox trade mission

(Warning: poultry metaphors are in operation)


Fox running into trade negotiations like a headless chicken - Farron 


Commenting on reports that Liam Fox is happy to import US chlorinated chicken as part of a UK-US trade deal Liberal Democrat MP Tim Farron said:

“Liam Fox is running into these trade negotiations like a headless chicken.

“Parliament will not back a reduction to food standards as part of the repeal bill. This is a betrayal of British poultry farmers who currently work to the highest standards in the world. Liam Fox’s dangerous grovelling to the US is only going to see his chickens come home to roost.

“The government knows that it is on the back foot in these trade negotiations but poisoning the nation’s food supply and wrecking the British poultry industry should not be on the table.”


Note

EU regulation 853/2004 says that only water to remove surface contamination from animal products is allowed and any another substance like chlorine needs to specifically have been approved by the EU

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0055:0205:en:PDF 
                        
That regulation will be transposed into UK law under the repeal bill and should require a majority in Parliament to scrap
                   
The poultry producer Moy Park is the largest private sector employer in Northern Ireland, employing 6,300, and would risk being undercut by cheap US imports.               

 George Eustice told Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party, currently Theresa May's supporters in parliament, in March 2017:                       

"The final thing I would mention on trade is the US, which is a major producer and exporter. I am aware that there are concerns about the standards of production in the US. It has lower standards of animal welfare and lower standards of food safety, and it allows approaches that are not currently allowed in the European Union, such as chlorine washes. It is important, as we contemplate any future trade deal, that we do not put our industry at an unfair disadvantage, as the hon. Gentleman pointed out, and we will clearly take very earnest account of that as we consider future trade deals"
 
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2017-03-13e.149.4                     
 

No comments: