Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Kirsty Williams: “We need a single port of call for children in Wales.”

The Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats, Kirsty Williams AM, has today launched a bid to give the Children’s Commissioner for Wales powers to do more to stand-up for children across Wales.

Kirsty Williams has written to the Minister for Children and Families, Sarah Teather MP, to ask that she give the Children’s Commissioner powers to investigate and speak up on non-devolved matters. Currently, the Commissioner is only allowed to work on devolved matters.

Commenting, Kirsty Williams said:

“This year sees ten years since the establishment of a Children’s Commissioner for Wales, and they have done a fantastic job speaking up for children in Wales. But they are often frustrated because they are limited in what they can do. I want there to be a single port-of-call for children in Wales.

“I’ve written to the Westminster Government to ask them to give these powers to the Welsh Commissioner. They are currently reviewing how the English Commissioner should work – now is the perfect time to make these changes. Now is the time for us in Wales to have a strong an independent Commissioner.”

The Welsh Liberal Democrats also believe that the Children’s Commissioner should be appointed by the National Assembly, rather than the First Minister, to ensure they are independent from Government.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Labour hypocrisy over Education Maintenance Allowance

Iain Roberts writes on Liberal Democrat Voicc:

For all of the noise Labour’s making about the EMA, you might not realise that it was their idea to scrap it. Before he was an ex shadow chancellor, Alan Johnson was Secretary of State for Education and in April 2007 he made it clear that Labour was planning to scrap the EMA.

"An incentive scheme that rewards 16- to 18-year-olds for staying in education post-16 will be abolished when the leaving age is increased to 18.

"The Secretary of State for Education said last week that education maintenance allowances (EMAs) would no longer be necessary when the age is raised in 2015.

"Giving evidence to the Education and Skills Select Committee inquiry into 14-19 education, Alan Johnson said: 'The EMA is there as an incentive to stay on. We will not need to incentivise after 2015.'"

It’s notable not only that Labour have conveniently forgotten their plans from Government, but also that the Labour Government did not see the EMA as the best way to help poor students through their post-16 studies.

This comes on top of the revelation that Alistair Darling planned to increase VAT to 19% if Labour got in again at the last election.


Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Anti Stock Transfer Campaigners Welcome Landmark Ruling!

The Defend Council Housing people have issued the following media release:

The Neath Port Talbot Defend Council Housing Campaign has welcomed today's ruling from the Freedom Of Information Commissioner that the Neath Port Talbot [council] was wrong to withhold vital information from the campaign which was trying to halt the transfer of thousands of council homes to NPT Homes Ltd.

According to Huw Pudner of the Defend Council Housing Campaign

' The legal ruling by the Information Commissioner has revealed serious shortcomings in the upper reaches of the Neath Port Talbot Council. Time and time again the Council delayed and prevaricated when it refused to provide the information that had been lawfully requested. Its illegal behaviour undoubtedly had a bearing on the result of the stock transfer ballot.The Council was warned that it was abusing the democratic process but chose to carry on regardless. It is now time for the Council to halt its discredited stock transfer plan'.

EXTRACTS BELOW FROM THE 2 PAGE LETTER AND 18 PAGE RULING FROM THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER DATED THE 17TH JAN 2011


'Dear Mr Pudner,
.....................Your complaint has been carefully considered and in this case the Commissioner has found in favour of yourself '
{from the letter }.

'THE DECISION'

point 61

'The Commissioner's decision is that the public authority did not deal with the request for information in accordance with the Act.

* It incorrectly applied section 40 [2] to withhold the information requested.

*It breached section 10 [1] for failing to provide the information following payment by the complainant of the requested fee.

* It breached section 17[1] for failing to issue a refusal notice within 20 working days of the request.

* It breached section 17 [1] [b] for failing to cite an exemption under Part 11 of the Act which it later relied on.

* When relying on section 12{1] of the Act ,it breached section 17 [5 ] for failing to issue a refusal notice within twenty working days from receipt of the request.

from page 12 of the ruling

STEPS REQUIRED
....
63 'The public authority must take the steps required by this notice within 35 days of the date of this Notice.'

FAILURE TO COMPLY
'Failure to comply with the steps described above may result in the Commissioner making written certification of this fact to the High Court pursuant to section 54 of the Act and may be dealt with as a contempt of court.'

OTHER MATTERS
'65 Although they do not form part of this Decision Notice the Commissioner wishes to highlight the following matters of concern:
66 The Commissioner note the Council declined to make a decision regarding this case at th internal review stage and recommended to the complainant that he should contact the Information Commissioner's Office.
67 The Commissioner notes that by failing to conduct a full internal review the Council breached the section 45 code of Practice.'

from page 13 of the ruling

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Nearly half of NHS repairs backlog put staff and patients at high and significant risk - German

New analysis of NHS estates in Wales has revealed that the cost of maintenance and repairs to reduce high and significant risks in NHS buildings to staff and patients is nearly half of the total backlog cost.

The Welsh Health Estates report reveals that the total cost of the NHS repairs backlog is £460 million and that the sum of high and significant risk repairs totals £209 million. While the total backlog of maintenance cost has decreased, there were 51 sites across Wales showing increases totalling over £20 million.

The Estate and Performance Report 2009/2010 also exposes how none of the new health trusts in Wales reached operationally safe levels or complied with statutory and safety regulations last year.

The report shows:
  • A total backlog of repairs of £460 million. (£209 million High and Significant Risk Cost)
  • Two Health Trusts are still failing to meet fire safety regulations set for 2005 and 2008 (Cwm Taf, Powys Teaching)
  • None of the Health Trusts met the 2008 target for statutory and safety regulations (DDA, asbestos, legionella, hazardous waste)
  • None of the Health Trusts met the 2008 target of getting 90% of the health estate in a ‘sound, operationally safe and exhibit only minor deterioration’ standard.
  • The cost of complying with fire safety code is estimated to be £14 million (an increase of £2million since 2008-2009)
  • The total cost of implementing DDA work is nearly £16 million.
  • Veronica German, Welsh Liberal Democrat Shadow Health Minister said:
    “This report is deeply worrying and shows the real extent of Labour’s financial mismanagement and poor running of our health system over the past years. This report also causes great concern as it reveals that nearly half of the backlog of repairs pose a high or significant risk to patients and staff.

    “It is equally worrying that none of the health trusts met the targets to meet statutory regulations regarding Disability Discrimination Act, Control of legionella and Health and Safety at Work. I don’t think that it’s acceptable that doctors and nurses have to work in buildings that would have to close if they were nightclubs.

    “The NHS in Wales has had since October 2004 to make sure that their buildings are DDA compliant, yet here we are, 6 years on, with £16 million worth of work to be done to ensure access for disabled people.

    “We know that money is tight and that the years to come will be difficult, however the Labour-Plaid Government has had years to address this issue and they failed. Labour has allowed a huge backlog of repairs to build up and now, when money is tight, they seek to address the problems. They are financially incompetent.

    “I want a health service where we have decent and safe buildings where patients and staff can recover and work in without fear from injury or harm.”


    www.welshlibdems.org.uk

    Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

    Wednesday, January 12, 2011

    Pensioner Income

    From Questions to the Department Of Work And Pensions, 10th January:

    Gregg McClymont (Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) (Lab): What assessment his Department has made of the effects of changes to prices in January 2011 on the incomes of pensioners.

    The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Steve Webb): In April this year, benefits and pensions will be increased by more than £4 billion, more than three quarters of which will go to pensioners. In addition, price rises in January 2011 will feed through into the September 2011 price indices, which will be used in future benefit uprating.

    Gregg McClymont: Pensioners on fixed incomes will be among the hardest hit by the Government's VAT rise. Will the Minister confirm that the VAT hike will mean that pensioners are worse off in 2011 under this Government than they would have been under the previous Government's plans?

    Steve Webb: I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for referring to the previous Government's plans. In his constituency, vulnerable pensioners, vulnerable disabled people and vulnerable families with young children received four or five cold weather payments this winter to help them with their fuel bills in January 2011. His policy, and the plans that we inherited, would have reduced those payments to £8.50 a week. We have paid £25 a week four or five times to vulnerable pensioners in his constituency.

    Rachel Reeves (Leeds West) (Lab): I will give the Minister another try: will he accept that with pensioners set to pay an extra £217 in 2011 because of the VAT rise, the basic state pension rising by only the same amount as planned by the previous Government and now news that the Department for Work and Pensions and the Treasury cannot agree the £140 flat-rate pension that he has extolled, pensioners have very little to look forward to in 2011 but a lot to fear?

    Steve Webb: The hon. Lady used to be an economist, so I would not dream of suggesting that any of the figures that she has quoted are in the slightest bit dodgy. She will be aware that colleagues at Her Majesty's Treasury have calculated that the impact of the VAT rise for each percentage point increase is just less than £1 a week for single pensioners. The 2.5% increase will cost pensioners £2.50 a week, which compares with our £4.50 pension increase this April, and there will be additional increases in 2012 because of the VAT rise, so I dispute her figures.

    Friday, January 07, 2011

    CLEGG PUSHES TO EXTEND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION LAWS

    Freedom of Information laws are to be extended as part of a push by Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg to make public bodies more accountable.

    The Deputy Prime Minister also wants to cut the length of time Government records are kept secret from 30 years to 20.

    Current FOI legislation covers councils and Government departments, but Mr Clegg wants it to include potentially hundreds more bodies such as the Association of Chief Police Officers, Financial Services Ombudsman and Universities and Colleges Admissions Service.

    In a speech to the Institute for Government today, Mr Clegg said that the reforms are "part of our wider project to resettle the relationship between people and government.

    "Free citizens must be able to hold big institutions and powerful individuals to account," he maintained.

    Mr Clegg acknowledged that progress was made under Labour but this had now "stalled". There are too many exemptions to the FOI Act, while information is often placed "behind tedious bureaucratic hurdles. We still live in a society where information is hoarded by the few. And, as we know, information is knowledge, and knowledge is power."

    Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) president Sir Hugh Orde welcomed the proposals. He said: "Any organisation that operates as part of a key public service should be accountable and open to public scrutiny. The Association of Chief Police Officers has been asking to be included under the Act and welcomes the extension of authorities that it offers."

    Thursday, January 06, 2011

    Councillor John Warman

    It is with regret that we announce that Councillor John Warman has
    chosen to leave the Liberal Democrats on Neath Port Talbot council and
    join the Labour group. Councillor Des Sparkes assures electors in the
    Cimla ward that he will continue to serve them to the best of his
    ability as their Liberal Democrat member.

    We wish to make clear that, contrary to insinuations by Welsh Labour leader
    Carwyn Jones, the local party has lost no activists and the membership has
    remained steady since its rise during the 2010 General Election.


    Thursday, December 23, 2010

    ID cards scrapped

    Identity cards were officially scrapped last night when the Identity Documents Bill was granted Royal Assent. Liberal Democrats have consistently campaigned against ID cards, a scheme introduced by the previous Labour Government. All existing ID cards will be cancelled within one month, and the National Identity Register will be destroyed within two months. The move has saved £845m in planned future investment over the next ten years.

    Friday, December 10, 2010

    Statement on Mick Bates

    Commenting on the conviction yesterday of Mick Bates AM for public order offences, Kirsty Williams, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats said:

    “Mick Bates has been a dedicated and effective voice for Montgomeryshire over many years. This judgement is a personal tragedy for him and his family but it is one we must respect.

    “The Welsh Liberal Democrats are clear that this conviction for a public order offence is incompatible with the high standards we expect of our elected representatives. Proceedings have begun to terminate his membership of the party.”


    Thursday, December 09, 2010

    "Ill thought out, lacking in detail and irresponsible shadow Welsh budget" says Peter Black

    Commenting on Conservative proposals to impose further cuts on top of those already proposed by the Welsh Government, Peter Black, Welsh Liberal Democrats Shadow Finance Minister said:

    “The Conservative shadow budget is ill thought out, lacking in detail and irresponsible. They have chosen to turn a blind eye to wasteful bureaucracy and over-management in the health service and instead pay for the inflated salaries of directors. That is not responsible budgeting.

    “They are prioritising slashing public services and not dealing with waste and inefficiency in government spending.

    “They also don’t realise that throwing money at the NHS and then have it misspent is not the way to have a healthier nation. Social housing, education, social care and improving people’s general wellbeing is the way to get a healthier nation. If you cut the social housing budget, for example, people will continue to live in poorly maintained houses which will, in turn, have a detrimental effect on their health. The Conservatives just don’t get the old maxim that prevention is better than cure.”

    On the massive cuts in economy and transport budget, Peter Black added:

    “While we were disappointed that the Labour and Plaid Government were making substantial cuts to the economy and transport budget, the Tories would decimate the budget by making even further cuts. The Welsh economy is in a very fragile position at the moment. Just yesterday, it was confirmed that Wales was the poorest nation, in economic terms, in the UK. Now is not the time to be taking a machete to the economy and transport budget.”


    Tuesday, November 30, 2010

    Welsh tuition fees scheme must see students beyond the Election

    Welsh Liberal Democrats Shadow Education Minister, Jenny Randerson AM, today broadly welcomed the tuition fees proposal but warned the test of the scheme will be its long term sustainability.

    Jenny Randerson said:

    “The Welsh Liberal Democrats have always said that we should seek to mitigate the impact of tuition fees on Welsh students. That remains the right approach even in a challenging financial environment.

    “But this must be a plan for the long term not a short term electoral fix for the Labour-Plaid government. I am concerned that the Minister was vague on the Government’s ability to fund future years.

    “This scheme responds to the Browne Review, with terms of reference set by a Labour Government. It is a scheme with merit but which needs to stand up to scrutiny over the coming weeks. I will also be looking to ensure that the Minister’s criteria for part time students delivers part time students a fair deal. We must also make sure that the cuts in HEFCW (the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales), or top slicing as the Minister calls it, will not leave some universities with a funding stream gap between financial years.”


    Thursday, November 25, 2010

    Further delay in electrification decision

    Commenting on the prospects of the electrification of the London to Swansea main line, Jenny Randerson AM, the Welsh Liberal Democrat Shadow Transport Minister said:

    “Gordon Brown announced the electrification project in 2009 and said work would start immediately but nothing happened. It is clear that not only did Labour fail to put aside any money to pay for the project, they had not carried out any of the detailed technical work needed before the project could even start. It is encouraging that the Government have signalled that they are still looking to progress this project and make an announcement in the new year. The Welsh Liberal Democrats are fully committed to the project, we have lobbied government extensively and continue to push for the technical assessments needed to be done as quickly as possible.”

    Wednesday, November 24, 2010

    WAG consultant contagion

    Liberal Democrat leader Kirsty Williams has criticised the Labour-Plaid Welsh Assembly Government for presiding over a sustained increase in spending on external consultants.

    Research by the Welsh Liberal Democrats has revealed that the spending on external consultants has increased every year for the past six years increasing from just £1.9 million in 2004 to a staggering £11.9 million last year (2009/10).

    WAG spend on external consultants by year:

    2004/05 £1.9 million
    2005/06 £2.5 million
    2006/07 £4.3 million
    2007/08 £4.6 million
    2008/09 £11.2 million
    2009/10 £11.9 million

    The continued rise in external consultants calls into question the ability of the Welsh government to deliver efficiency savings of £50 million in Central Services and Administration as set out in their budget last week, over three years.

    Kirsty said: “The people of Wales will be appalled that spending on external consultants has soared under Labour-Plaid and is continuing to rise at a time when they should be directing money into front line services.

    “As spending on consultants has increased, the total number of civil servants working for the Welsh government has more than doubled in the last ten years.

    “People will soon grow tired of the First Minister’s crocodile tears of the Welsh budget settlement when he is failing to get to grips with wasteful spending.

    “When governments at all levels have to make difficult decisions about spending, the Welsh people need the Labour-Plaid Government to get serious about rooting out waste and inefficiency so that front line services do not suffer. It seems that Labour and Plaid Cymru are oblivious to the tough times we are facing.”

    Thursday, November 18, 2010

    Labour-Plaid budget a missed opportunity on NHS waste, economic growth and pupil premium

    The Welsh Liberal Democrats have responded to the Labour-Plaid budget, describing it as a missed opportunity to build Wales’s economic future, root out waste in the NHS and target funding at the poorest school children.

    Kirsty Williams, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats said:

    “Welsh Liberal Democrats want front line health services protected but that does not mean that savings cannot be made in NHS bureaucracy. It is no good protecting the health budget when there is evidence that £1 billion of the health budget is being misspent.

    “Despite the drop in unemployment announced in today’s figures, the economic recovery is still fragile. In these circumstances, it beggars belief that the economy and transport department that should be driving the Welsh economic recovery has faced some of the biggest cuts.

    “The Labour-Plaid Government has consistently underfunded our schools. Education spending in Wales is over £530 lower per pupil than in England and this is reflected in Wales’s poorer exam performance. We welcome the commitment to the roll out of the foundation phase but it is desperately disappointing that the government hasn’t taken the opportunity to close the funding gap at all levels, starting with children from the poorest backgrounds. Neither should we be fooled into thinking that this is an education budget when the government are paying for their school funding by cutting cash from universities and FE colleges.

    “As families and businesses tighten their belts, the public expect our Government to do the same. It is encouraging that this year’s budget seems to be looking for the savings in administration and central bureaucracy that the Welsh Liberal Democrats have called for.

    “However, in some areas the steps being taken are far too tentative. One year after the Welsh Liberal Democrats proposed merging the numerous environmental quangos, the Labour Plaid government is only now promising ‘a review of options’ aimed at saving taxpayers money in this area.

    “The Welsh Liberal Democrats will be seeking to work cooperatively with the government to address these concerns.”


    Tuesday, November 16, 2010

    The Welsh budget must include a pupil premium – Kirsty Williams

    A day before the Welsh Government’s budget is announced, the Welsh Liberal Democrats are calling on the Labour-Plaid Government to ensure they root out waste and inefficiency in order to prioritise improving educational life chances for the poorest children.

    Welsh Liberal Democrat Leader, Kirsty Williams said:

    “Tackling waste must be a priority for this budget. Only one in five people think that public bodies in Wales used their resources in the most effective way. This reflects the concern of the Welsh Liberal Democrats that currently the Labour-Plaid government has not done enough to root out inefficiency in our public services. As families and businesses tighten their belts, it is reasonable of the public to expect our Government to do the same. It is by making efficiencies that the Welsh Government will be able to prioritise improving the life chances of the poorest children in Wales.

    “The Labour-Plaid Government has consistently underfunded our schools. Education spending in Wales is over £500 lower per pupil than in England and sadly, this is now reflected in Wales’s poorer performance at GCSE and A level – where we have now slipped behind England for the first time.

    “It is vital that in Wales we begin to close this funding gap, starting with children from the poorest backgrounds.

    “The start you have in life can determine your prospects for the rest of your life so extra resources must be targeted at those who start the furthest behind.

    “The Welsh budget is a chance to put that situation right for the poorest children in society. The Welsh Liberal Democrats are calling for a Welsh pupil premium that would mean schools would be able to help children from poorer homes much more effectively.”

    Tuesday, November 09, 2010

    Spend money on tackling issue, not talking about it – Kirsty Williams

    With a week to go until the Welsh Government’s budget is announced, the Welsh Liberal Democrats are calling on the Labour-Plaid Government to ensure that money allocated to government departments is put to the very best use.

    £3.5 million of Welsh Government money has been spent in the last three years on climate change awareness, rather than programmes that directly reduce carbon emissions. Grants include £20,000 over two years for an annual newspaper supplements on climate change and over £0.5 million a year to the Sustainable Development Commission and Cynnal Cymru.

    Welsh Liberal Democrats estimated that this money could have paid for around 1000 improvements to homes in fuel poverty through the Home Energy Efficiency Scheme – making an immediate impact on carbon emissions.

    Previously, the Welsh Liberal Democrats also criticised the Environment Minister for spending nearly half a million pounds on bag tax publicity.

    Welsh Liberal Democrat Leader Kirsty Williams said: “With just over a week to go until the Labour-Plaid Government announce their budget for next year, Ministers need to ensure that taxpayers money is put to the very best use to tackle the problems we face in the most efficient manner possible.

    “In the forthcoming budget the Labour-Plaid Government must make spending decisions based on delivering real results. Public awareness campaigns can play a part in highlighting issues but there are some areas, like climate change, where we’ve seen huge amounts spent on public awareness from films, celebrities and the voluntary sector with limited results.

    “The Labour-Plaid Government didn’t have to spend £3.5 million on telling people about climate change. They didn’t have to spend £400,000 on plastic bag tax publicity as people will be well aware that they will have to pay 5p for a bag when they get to the till.

    “The days of spend, spend, spend are over and now we are entering a time where efficiency and value for money should be the mantra.”

    Labour Want Students to Pay More, says LibDem MP

    Adrian Sanders, Liberal Democrat MP for Torbay, says:

    "Why the media lets Labour get away with it I really don't understand, and the hypocrisy of the Labour Party supporting NUS leader is astounding. Who introduced tuition fees? Who commissioned Lord Browne and gave him his remit to look at the future funding of higher education? Which Party opposes the abolition of tuition fees and is split over a Graduate Tax? It's Labour, Labour, Labour.

    "The Lib Dems still want to abolish tuition fees over the life time of a Parliament but can't until they get a majority of the seats in the House of Commons. So until people stop voting Labour and Tory we will be stuck with Tuition fees.

    "The Coalition agreement changed for the period of the Coalition the Lib Dem pledge to vote against any rise in tuition fees. Instead we were given an opt out to abstain in exchange for being able to influence the Government's response to Browne.

    "And this is what that Lib Dem influence has achieved:

    · All students will repay less per month under this Government's policy than they currently pay.

    · The lowest earning 25% of graduates will repay less under this Government's policy than they do now.

    · The top earning 30% of graduates will pay back more than they borrow and are likely to pay more than double the bottom 20% of earners.

    · Over half a million students will be eligible for more non-repayable grants for living costs than they get now.

    · Almost one million students will be eligible for more overall maintenance support than they get now

    · Part time students will no longer have to pay upfront fees benefiting up to 200,000 per year

    · There will be an extra £150m for a new National Scholarship Programme for students from poorer backgrounds and we will introduce tough new sanctions of universities who fail to improve their access to students from backgrounds.

    "Labour opposes the above and wants to make students pay more, so why are the media letting Labour get away with it."

    Friday, November 05, 2010

    Labour MP's election at Oldham & Saddleworth deemed void

    The verdict of the Special Election Court, held in Saddleworth, was announced this morning. It found against Phil Woolas, the shadow immigration minister.

    Mr Justice Teare said: "In an election address entitled The Examiner, the
    respondent [Mr Woolas] made a statement of fact, the meaning of which was
    that the petitioner [Mr Watkins] attempted to woo, that is to seek, the
    electoral support of Muslims who advocated violence, in particular
    violence to the respondent.

    "In a further election address entitled Labour Rose, he made a statement
    of fact the meaning of which was that the petitioner had refused to
    condemn extremists who advocated violence against the respondent.

    "We have concluded that both of these statements, although made in the
    context of an election and said to arise from a political position adopted
    by the petitioner, were in relation to the petitioner's personal character
    or conduct.

    "In our judgment to say that a person has sought the electoral support of
    persons who advocate extreme violence, in particular to his personal
    opponent, clearly attacks his personal character or conduct.

    "It suggests that he is willing to condone threats of violence in pursuit
    of personal advantage.

    "Having considered the evidence which was adduced in court we are sure
    that these statements were untrue. We are also sure that the respondent
    had no reasonable grounds for believing them to be true and did not
    believe them to be true.

    "We also found that (in) an earlier election address the respondent had
    made a statement in fact, namely, that the petitioner had reneged on his
    promise to live in the constituency. This too, although made in the
    context of an election and said to arise from a statement made by the
    petitioner as a candidate in that election, was in relation to his
    personal character or conduct.

    "It suggests that he is untrustworthy. The statement was false and the
    respondent had no reasonable ground for believing it to be true and did
    not believe it to be true.

    "It follows in our judgment that the respondent is guilty of an illegal
    practice, contrary to section 136 of the Representation of the People Act
    1983 with regard to those statements."

    The judge concluded: "The consequence of our finding that the respondent
    is guilty of an illegal practice with regard to the statements we have
    referred to is that, pursuant to section 159(1) of the Act, his election
    as Member of Parliament for the constituency of Oldham East and
    Saddleworth is void and we have so reported to the Speaker of the House of
    Commons.

    "We are satisfied that the statutory penalties for the illegal practices
    committed by the respondent are both necessary and proportionate, having
    regard to the seriousness of the statements made with regard to the
    petitioner's alleged attitude to the Muslim extremists who advocated
    violence."

    The judges made no reference to the sanctions on Mr Woolas, although it is
    thought he could be barred from public office for a period of time.

    The court remains in session as the judges deliberate on costs and Mr
    Woolas's plans to launch a judicial review of the decision.

    A Conservative's take on the coalition's compromises

    On Tim Montgomerie's Conservative Home posting, Mark Pack comments:

    Such are the realities of coalition politics — everyone has to compromise, recognising that no one party won the election. If the public really wanted undiluted Conservative or Lib Dem policies we needed to vote for them in sufficient numbers: we, the public, didn’t give either party that mandate, so now the politicians are making the best of the situation. Policies from all parties are being diluted: no wonder purists hate it.

    As I commented in May, immediately after the Coalition Agreement was signed:

    Many of the hobby horses of political parties which are not mainstream, and do not command majority public support, are jettisoned. Instead politicians learn to focus on those policy areas which they know the public will like, and on which there’s widespread agreement. Parties hate it – they like to be in control – but the public is the winner.

    Thursday, November 04, 2010

    Welsh language official status failure: ‘a betrayal of historic proportions’

    Commenting on the publication of a letter in the Western Mail calling on the Labour-Plaid government to honour their pledge for Welsh to be declared an official language, Eleanor Burnham AM, Welsh Liberal Democrat Shadow Heritage Minister said:

    “The Welsh Liberal Democrats have consistently argued that this legislation does not go far enough to protect and promote the Welsh language but our protests have fallen on deaf ears.

    “It is staggering that so many distinguished champions of Welsh language and culture have now been driven to this extraordinary step to highlight the Labour-Plaid government’s lack of ambition for the Welsh language. After all, the Labour-Plaid government promised to give Welsh official language status in the One Wales agreement.

    “Having posed as the defenders of the Welsh language for decades, if Plaid fail to give the Welsh language official status, it would be a betrayal of historic proportions.

    “The Labour-Plaid government must now sit up and take notice and, even at this late stage, give the Welsh language the status in law that so many have campaigned for decades.

    Wednesday, November 03, 2010

    Kirsty Williams: Glastir scheme needs urgent reform

    Kirsty Williams, AM for Brecon and Radnorshire and the Welsh Liberal Democrat spokesperson on Rural Affairs, has once again criticised the Welsh Assembly Government’s flawed flagship agricultural policy Glastir during an Assembly debate on the future of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) today.

    Kirsty Williams said:

    "CAP reform will be absolutely crucial in supporting agriculture in Wales in the future. Single Farm Payments make up between 80 and 90 per cent of many farm incomes, and moving to area based payments will cause great upheaval, especially in areas such as my own Brecon and Radnorshire who have traditionally benefitted from the historical based payments. I am therefore very pleased that the Rural Development Sub Committee has seen fit to investigate the CAP at this stage.

    Adequate incomes for farmers are crucial for food security and the protection of our natural environment. It is ironic therefore that whilst the Rural Affairs Minister Elin Jones accepts the need for agriculture to play its part in preserving our environment we are in the middle of the debacle that is Glastir. The scheme is so chaotic that many farmers will not enter the scheme and all of the environmental management carried out by farmers under previous agri environmental schemes will be lost. Time is running out for the Minister to look again at the scheme, and I urge her to do so.

    Tuesday, November 02, 2010

    Time for the Welsh Government to get a grip of falling educational standards

    Commenting on new research published today which shows that Secondary schools are performing worse in Wales than England, Kirsty Williams AM, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats, said:

    "The Welsh Liberal Democrats are fully committed to creating a fair education system that gives every child in Wales a fair start in order to reach their full potential, whatever their background.

    “This report makes for worrying reading, finding that there has been a fall in educational standards in Wales of 1.92 GCSE grades per student per year. After decades of priding itself on the higher educational standards we promoted in Wales, we have slipped behind England. This must now be one of the most serious challenges facing the Welsh Government.

    "The Labour-Plaid Government has consistently underfunded our schools. Education spending in Wales is over £500 lower per pupil than in England.

    “The poorest Welsh children are almost three times less likely to leave school with five good GCSEs than their richer classmates. And now, for the first time since devolution, there is a gap opening up as English GCSE and A Level students outperform their Welsh peers.

    "League tables were abolished in 2001 for sound reasons with support from politicians, academics and teachers. We must always be careful to keep an open mind. If the government believes that league tables are not the reason for the worrying drop in standards, what is?

    “Pupils in England will soon begin to benefit from the Pupil Premium that will target extra money at schools admitting disadvantaged pupils. Thousands of children in England will finally be getting the extra support they need to succeed. The challenge now is for the Welsh Government to provide similar support so that Welsh children are not further disadvantaged.”

    Welsh Liberal Democrats give cautious welcome to Waste Measure

    Kirsty Williams AM Welsh Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for the Environment, Sustainability and Rural Affairs has today welcomed the passing of the Wales (Waste) measure in the National Assembly for Wales.

    The Measure aims to reduce the amount of waste and litter and to develop more effective waste management solutions here in Wales. Changes include introducing statutory targets for local authorities to meet in terms of recycling household waste, and gives ministers the ability to make retailers charge a fee for single use carrier bags.

    Kirsty Williams said: “I am pleased that the Assembly has today passed the Waste Measure, which will help contribute to protecting Wales’ environment and our planet for the future. I am also pleased that the Minister has listened to advice and not only reduced the cost of the charge from 7p to 5p, but in light of the current economic circumstances also delayed the introduction until October 2011. I am however flabbergasted at the lack of preparation in some areas of the legislation, for example in terms of banning some subtances from landfill, the government haven’t even decided which body will oversee it. At stage two of the measure the Minister eluded to the Environment Agency being in charge, but in the chamber today she admitted that the Environment hadn’t even been contacted. Whilst I welcome the basic principles of the measure, this haphazard way of making legislation is not good for Welsh democracy.”


    Saturday, October 30, 2010

    Thursday, October 28, 2010

    £1.3bn funding boost for Post Office

    The Post Office will receive £1.3 billion of extra funding over the next four years, Business Secretary Vince Cable has announced.

    Vince told the Commons the funding would be used to reform the network and secure its long term future, reversing years of decline. Outlining the boost during yesterday's second reading of the Postal Services Bill, which sets out plans to privatise Royal Mail, Mr Cable told MPs: "I can announce today £1.34 billion of new funding for the Post Office over the spending review period.

    "The funding will be used to reform the current network, to change the underlying economics and so reverse the years of decline and secure its long-term future."

    He said earlier this month that private buyers will be allowed to own up to 90% of the Royal Mail, with at least 10% of shares going to employees, while the Post Office may be mutualised.

    The staff share scheme would be the biggest of its kind - larger than those of British Telecom, British Gas or British Airways, he said.

    Tuesday, October 26, 2010

    Wind projects boost could bring 70,000 jobs

    The Government yesterday announced moves aimed at creating up to 70,000 new jobs through a £60 million improvement to ports to boost offshore wind projects.

    Chris Huhne, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, said: "We might be world leaders in offshore wind but we know there is still more to do. If we want the jobs, manufacturing and skills base for this exciting new industry to be here in the UK we need to make decisions that attract investment.

    "We need world-class infrastructure to support our economic growth. So today we have made sure that even in the face of such pressure on public finances, we prioritise the areas that will help us dump the deficit."

    The Prime Minister said the potential for Britain to lead the world in the offshore wind industry was "immense", especially as thousands of turbines would be needed in the next decade. "Manufacturing these needs large factories which have to be on the coast, yet neither the factories nor the large port sites exist and that, understandably, is putting off private investors,"

    Business Secretary Vince Cable said: "It is very positive news that three major players in the offshore wind industry, GE, Siemens and Gamesa, have plans to come to the UK and invest in manufacturing. The Government's approach to growth and investment is the right one. The global market for low carbon goods and services is expected to rise to over GBP4 trillion by the middle of the next decade. We are already the sixth largest market for low carbon economic goods and services so we are well placed in this sector."

    Monday, October 25, 2010

    Peter Black tops regional list again

    The ballots for the Liberal Democrat regional lists were counted this evening. The order, as voted on a one-member one-vote basis, for each of the regions is as follows:

    South Wales West
    1. Peter Black
    2. Stuart Rice
    3. Cheryl Green
    4. Wayne Morgan
    5. Frank Little

    South Wales Central
    1. John Dixon
    2. Eluned Parrott
    3. Rachael Hitchinson
    4. Elgan Morgan
    5. Andrew Sherwood

    South Wales East
    1. Veronica German
    2. Phil Hobson
    3. Bob Griffin
    4. Alison Willott

    Mid and West Wales
    1. Bill Powell
    2. Mark Cox
    3. Ed Wilson
    4. Steffan John

    North Wales
    1. Aled Roberts
    2. Eleanor Burnham

    Elections for candidates for individual constituencies will follow shortly.

    Thursday, October 21, 2010

    Welsh LibDem comments on the Comprehensive Spending Review

    Freedom Central reports the views of leader Kirsty Williams and local AM and housing spokesman Peter Black. It should be emphasised that the cut in the money Westminster gives to Cardiff for day-to-day running falls only around 2%, and that after predicted inflation is taken into account. The Labour-Plaid Welsh Assembly Government coalition leader is trying to make the settlement look worse by adding in the closure of the Newport Passport Office, the cancellation of the Great Western electrification and the postponement of a decision on a military training establishment in the Vale of Glamorgan. I understand that the principal objection in the last case is to the PFI ("live now, pay later") nature of the scheme. These involve the loss of jobs, actual or potential, but not revenue to WAG, so it is misleading to lump them in with the rest of the cuts.

    It is certainly no excuse for further cutting the grants to local authorities, in view of the way Cardiff bureaucracy has grown since the turn of the century, and of yesterday's revelation that the Health department has spent three-quarters of a million pounds on external consultants, including half a million on a report from McKinsey whose existence it tried to cover up.


    Frank Little

    Wednesday, October 20, 2010

    European liberals attempt to save money on Strasbourg is thwarted

    Yesterday, MEP Sarah Ludford reported on an attempt to save some money on the European Parliament's regular shuttling between Brussels and Strasbourg by combining two of the September sessions. (Cancelling the farcical transfer of MEPs, officials and documents requires a heads of government resolution.)

    Today, even this modest cost-cutting proposal has been stymied by Conservatives and Socialists at the behest of their French and German leaders.

    Tuesday, October 19, 2010

    Construction of Trident submarines put back to next parliament

    Party President Ros Scott writes:

    The Liberal Democrats have long argued that Trident is an out of date, unnecessary and hugely expensive weapons system that the UK has no need of in modern times. In this period of fiscal constraint it is also a luxury we can ill afford. Nick Clegg was right to argue powerfully against Trident renewal during the Leader's Debates. Our party was right to stand in contrast to both the Conservatives and Labour on this issue.

    Today, within the Strategic Defence Review, the Coalition Government announced that there will be no final decision on the like-for-like replacement of Trident during this parliament. So Trident will not be renewed this parliament - not on a Liberal Democrat watch. Let us be clear, this is a significant victory for Liberal Democrat campaigners, and a fantastic example of what our Ministers can and do achieve in government.

    But the Coalition Government is not just saying no to replacing Trident this parliament. It is going further. It is also taking important steps towards the goal of multilateral nuclear disarmament. The announcement today sees a 25% cut in warheads.

    Today is yet another day that we can all feel hugely proud to be a party of government, delivering key Liberal Democrat priorities.

    Phil Willis on Browne

    Frank Little writes:

    There is an interesting contribution to the debate on the Browne report at Liberal Democrat Voice by Lord Willis of Knaresborough, who, as MP for Harrogate was the chairman of the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee. He writes:

    "As they stand Vince Cable and the Liberal Democrats, rather than hide their heads in embarrassment should be congratulated in fighting for elements in the package that meet Liberal Democrat aspirations. As the IFS (not noted for their pro-liberal stance) concluded – the Browne proposals 'are highly progressive and ensure that the poorest 30% of graduates are better off, whilst ensuring that the richest 30% of graduates pay off their loans in full'. Hardly an outcome that would have resulted from a Conservative government."

    The Institute for Fiscal Studies was hard on the Osborne Emergency Budget. Labour seized on its report at the time (though glossing over the parts which do not suit their spin), but has been silent on the IFS judgment on Browne.

    Monday, October 18, 2010

    Chris Huhne: half of new power will be renewable

    Chris Huhne has today published a written ministerial statement on the UK’s future energy provision.

    New power generation capacity equal to three-quarters of current capacity will be needed between now and 2025. It must and will be a low-carbon mix, with renewables will be over half of this new power capacity.

    Of the remainder new nuclear without public subsidy is free to contribute, and today the Coalition is taking two regulatory steps to enable this.

    The Government will not pursue a Severn tidal scheme at this time as there is currently not an economic or environmental case for the Severn Barrage. Instead we must focus on technologies that can create jobs at home and tackle climate change globally – such as offshore wind and carbon capture and storage.

    What is being published?

    Today DECC publishes the energy National Policy Statements (NPS), alongside two regulatory steps that must be taken to permit new nuclear stations to be built.

    What new power generation is needed?

    The NPS projects a need for 59GW of new capacity by 2025.

    • Over half (33GW) will be from renewables, and 8 GW of non-renewable technology is already under construction.
    • This leaves 18GW to come from new non-renewable capacity, and nuclear is free to contribute to this capacity – without public subsidy.
    • The sites potentially suitable for nuclear by 2025 are identified as Bradwell; Hartlepool; Heysham; Hinkley Point; Oldbury; Sizewell; Sellafield; and Wylfa.
      • Rejected from the list were Dungeness in Kent, Braystones and Kirksanton in Cumbria.

    Sunday, October 17, 2010

    Labour's Browne review attacked by Welsh LibDems

    The Welsh Liberal Democrat Autumn Conference in Brecon today passed the following motion, proposed by Liberal Youth:

    Conference notes:
    1. The "Browne Review" of October 12th and its recommendations for Higher Education funding in England
    2. That the implementation of this will have major effects on the future of student finance in Wales
    3. That the Welsh Liberal Democrats are opposed to Tuition fees, and that our MPs pledged to vote against any increase in fees ahead of the General Election

    Conference believes:
    1. that there are alternative ways to fund higher education that do not involve burdening the students of today with high levels of debt
    2. that higher education should remain affordable and an option to people, whatever their economic background

    Conference calls for
    1. Welsh Liberal Democrats to reject the wholesale implementation of the proposals of the Browne Review
    2. the Welsh Liberal Democrat Assembly Group to do everything possible to mitigate the effect on Welsh students of any change in funding in England
    3. The Welsh Assembly Government to urgently address the Higher Education Funding Gap, and divert wasteful economic development spending to fund Welsh Universities.

    Saturday, October 16, 2010

    Comprehensive Spending Review


    “There is a hard road to recovery ahead, but we are determined to ensure it is a road that leads to fairness too.”

    We are taking action to cut the deficit because we have to. Last year, one in every four pounds the government spent was borrowed. That’s not how you’d run a home, and it’s not how you should run a government. It won’t be easy, but it’s the right thing to do, and is in our long term national interest.

    The least progressive thing of all would be to burden future generations with the debts that Labour left us. Instead the choices we make will invest in their future - to give everyone the opportunity for a fair start in life regardless, of their background.

    Even in the toughest of times, the right thing to do is to invest in the future. This is how we will carry out Britain’s unavoidable spending cuts: in a way that brings the country together and makes it stronger.

    • These are Labour’s cuts:
      • Gordon Brown and the Labour party’s parting gift was the largest structural deficit in the G20.
      • In 2009-10, one pound in every four of Government spending was borrowed.
      • Furthermore, we’re spending more money on the interest on our debt, £120 million per day, than on many key public services- more than on transport or law and order
    • Delayed pain would be greater pain for longer:
      • If we did not take action, interest rates would inevitably rise. That would push up debt interest payments, mortgage payments and damage growth.
      • Delaying the implementation of fiscal consolidation, as Labour proposed, prolongs the adjustment and so requires further action – through tax rises or spending reductions – to offset higher debt interest costs. Labour’s plan means greater pain for longer.
      • Since the General Election market interest rates (10yr Gilt) have fallen by 0.94%.
    • In support of our actions:
      • The OECD described the Budget as a “courageous move”, saying that “It provides the necessary degree of fiscal consolidation over the coming years to restore public finances to a sustainable path, while still supporting the recovery.
      • The Governor of the Bank of England stated that the Budget had “reduced downside risks... through removing the possibility of a sharper downturn in output resulting from higher long-term interest rates”
      • The IMF said: “The government's strong and credible multi-year fiscal deficit reduction plan is essential to ensure debt sustainability.”

    Nick Clegg announces ‘fairness premium’

    Next week's comprehensive spending review (CSR) will include a £7 billion "fairness premium" to help children from poorer families as they go through nursery, school and university, Nick Clegg announced today.

    The package will include free pre-school education for two-year-olds from disadvantaged households, a "pupil premium" providing extra cash while they are at school and a "student premium" to help them in higher education. The new cash is expected to support children from the poorest 20% of families.

    • This was a key Liberal Democrat election pledge that we are now delivering in Government
    • In the Spending Review we will provide extra funds – a total of over £7 billion – for a “fairness premium”, stretching from the age of two to the age of twenty. This is money spent on giving the poorest children a better start in life.
    • So while the CSR will cut spending, it will increase our investments in fairness, and in particular in the promotion of social mobility and life chances.

    1. Early Years

    · The 15hrs a week currently available for all 3 and 4 year olds will be protected.

    · In addition, we will be adding an additional 15hrs a week of early years education for 2 year olds for the poorest families (the bottom 20% - children who receive full school meals).

    2. The Pupil Premium

    · The Pupil Premium means schools will receive additional funds to offer targeted help to every pupil eligible for free school meals. This will reduce educational inequalities.

    · This is longstanding Liberal Democrat policy and one of our four key manifesto pledges.

    · It is not up to Whitehall or politicians how they spend that money. It is up to the schools themselves.

    o It is earmarked to help those who need it most but it can be used for one-to-one tuition; catch-up classes; after school projects; new equipment. Whatever schools and teachers feel will help their children the most.

    · It is not just the poorest students which will benefit from this. All the evidence shows that the increase in funds will help drag the whole class along. For example, all children in the school (not just the poorest students at whom the Premium is targeted) would benefit from new equipment.

    · In the long-term, this will benefit everyone. Targeted intervention at our poorest students will cut crime, mean less spending on damaged adults etc.

    3. University

    · Vince Cable will make an announcement in the next couple of weeks about how we will provide a student premium to the least advantaged students to ensure that bright children from disadvantaged backgrounds are not held back by the circumstances of their birth.


    (Although the pupil premium as such will be delivered only in England, the settlement for the Welsh Assembly Government will take account of it.)

    Friday, October 15, 2010

    Neath North by-election, 14th October

    Protheroe (Labour) (elected) 437
    Howells (Neath Port Talbot Independent Party) 144
    Maccathail (Plaid Cymru) 132
    McCarthy (Liberal Democrat) 51
    Turnout 24.08%

    Frank Little writes: We were defeated on largely national issues (the issue of the Browne report, recommending a lifting of the cap on the cost of university courses did not help), and the untrue allegation that our candidate would stop the rebuilding of the Gwyn Hall. However, it was the first time that we had seriously contested this ward. I consider our campaign was a good one and a start on which we can build.

    Tuesday, October 12, 2010

    Welsh success in ALDC elections

    Frank Little writes:
    Regrettably, I was unable to attend Federal Conference and thus also the AGM of the Association of Liberal Democrat Councillors, or I would have been able to post this sooner. The new president is Cllr Veronica German AM (Torfaen). A former LibDem Lliw Valley councillor now resident in Warwickshire, Sarah Boad, is secretary.

    The official Welsh representative is Cllr Kevin O’Connor (Merthyr Tydfil).

    Saturday, October 09, 2010

    Welsh LibDem leader objects to Passport Office closure proposal

    Kirsty Williams AM, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats has responded to reports that the Identity and Passport Service (IPS) is considering closing the Newport passport office:

    “To suggest that every passport office should remain open except for the only one serving South Wales and South West England is at best high handed and will leave millions of people with an inferior service to the rest of the UK, as well as threatening hundreds of jobs.

    “Of course, all public agencies must seek to achieve best value for money in very difficult times but this must be done sensitively with the aim of providing a good service across the UK.

    “My understanding is that, at this stage, this is a proposal for consultation and I shall be responding to express my concerns as I am sure many others will.”


    Labour Shadow Cabinet elections

    Every single member of Ed Miliband’s new shadow cabinet served in Gordon Brown’s government.

    Of the 19 members of the new shadow cabinet, 11 served as cabinet ministers under Brown, while the other eight held ministerial posts.

    Every member of the new shadow cabinet voted for ID cards. Of the 14 who were MPs at the time, 12 voted for the invasion of Iraq.

    Miliband himself was a key adviser to Brown in the Treasury, including chairing his Council of Economic Advisers, responsible for long-term economic planning. He was then parachuted into a safe seat and fast-tracked into the cabinet before writing Brown’s election manifesto.

    Miliband claimed his election heralded a new generation in Labour politics, but his shadow cabinet is made of the same New Labour politicians that spent recklessly and left the economy in tatters, stole our freedoms, left our political system in disgrace and failed to close the huge gap between the richest and the poorest.

    The Daily Telegraph has analysed the background of all the new Shadow Cabinet members and has found that they are overwhelmingly white, privileged and heterosexual. Social diversity was delivered a blow with Diane Abbott, Ben Bradshaw and Chris Bryant not getting a place.

    The full list of the new Shadow Cabinet can be found here.

    Wednesday, October 06, 2010

    Ex-Labour leader falsely accused by press

    Frank Little writes: I wish to correct a story, published on this party website in good faith, that Derek Vaughan claimed money to which he was not entitled. In fact, the South Wales Police Authority allowance was paid automatically, not claimed, and Mr Vaughan has returned the sums involved. In our defence, it should be noted that we merely relayed, without addition, a "news item" in the Evening Post.

    Saturday, October 02, 2010

    Ed Miliband's record

    In his leadership speech to the Labour conference in Manchester, Ed Miliband tried to rewrite history by putting distance between himself and New Labour and presenting himself as part of a new generation of Labour politicians.

    The truth is Ed Miliband spent the last 13 years at the heart of the New Labour project. He was an adviser in Gordon Brown’s Treasury from 1997 and went on to chair the Council of Economic Advisers, responsible for long-term economic planning, in 2004.

    He was then parachuted into a safe seat and quickly appointed as a minister in Brown’s cabinet before writing his 2010 election manifesto. He was an integral part of the Labour Government that left the economy in tatters, faced allegations of complicity in torture, stole our freedoms,
    left our political system in disgrace and failed to close the huge gap between the richest and the poorest.

    In the Treasury he was reckless with our money. When he was in charge of environment policy he was timid and weak, including giving the green light to the third runway at Heathrow.

    Voting record: Ed Miliband’s voting record shows that he was fully signed up to New Labour’s assault on civil liberties and voted against an investigation into the Iraq war. He was also weak on tackling climate change and bringing greater transparency to Parliament.

    Voted for:
    • Control orders
    • Identity Cards
    • Reducing parliamentary scrutiny (eg. The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act)
    • All the Terrorism Bill’s clauses including 42 and 90 day detention
    • Trident replacement
    Voted against:
    • Introducing Parliamentary approval to be required for deployment of the Armed Forces
    • An investigation into the Iraq war
    Patchy record on:
    Climate Change – He introduced legislation which included a pledge to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050 (Miliband’s 60% target was only increased after pressure by the Liberal Democrats) but:
    • Voted against a 2007 Liberal Democrat motion calling on the Government to do significantly more on climate change
    • Was absent in 2008 on a vote to allow consumers to be paid renewable energy feed-in tariffs
    • Was absent in 2008 on a Planning Bill amendment to consider climate change in applications
    • Voted against a clause in the Climate Change Bill allowing the Secretary of State to set a maximum level of carbon emissions for energy plants in 2008
    • Voted against the 2009 Lib Dem 10:10 motion calling on the House to reduce energy usage by 10% during 2010

    Transparency of Parliament:

    Voted for MPs’ expenses and financial interests to be made public in 2009 but was absent on all other Freedom of Information amendments relating to making Parliament more transparent (most notably the 2008 vote on the report from the Members Estimate Committee which recommended external audits of the Additional Costs Allowance).

    Friday, October 01, 2010

    The Minimum Wage rises

    The national minimum wage increased by 13p an hour to £5.93 this week, benefiting an estimated one million, mainly women, workers.

    A new hourly rate of £2.50 was introduced at the same time for apprentices, who previously did not qualify for a statutory wage. The age threshold for paying the adult rate will be reduced from 22 to 21, giving an estimated 50,000 people a pay rise of more than 20%.

    To mark the increase, the Government announced that employers who deliberately flouted minimum wage laws will be publicly named under a new scheme.

    Liberal Democrat Employment Relations minister Ed Davey said: "Bad publicity can be a powerful weapon in the fight against employers who try to cheat their workers and their competitors. Their reputation can be badly damaged if they are seen to be flouting the law.

    "Responsible employers should also make themselves aware of the new rates that come into effect today. The increases to the national minimum wage this year are appropriate for the economic climate. They will strike a balance between helping the lowest paid whilst at the same time not jeopardising their employment.

    TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "This increase will put extra cash in the pockets of some of the UK's lowest paid workers and today there are also significant gains for apprentices and young workers."

    Liberal Democrat policies in action

    This is a list of policies that were in our manifesto, and not the Tories', that are in the coalition agreement:

    We will bring forward detailed proposals for robust action to tackle
    unacceptable bonuses in the financial services sector; in developing these
    proposals, we will ensure they are effective in reducing risk.

    We want the banking system to serve business, not the other way round. We
    will bring forward detailed proposals to foster diversity in financial
    services, promote mutuals and create a more competitive banking industry.

    We will take steps to reduce systemic risk in the banking system and will
    establish an independent commission to investigate the complex issue of
    separating retail and investment banking in a sustainable way; while
    recognising that this will take time to get right, the commission will be
    given an initial time frame of one year to report.

    We will cut red tape by introducing a ‘one-in, one-out’ rule whereby no
    new regulation is brought in without other regulation being cut by a
    greater amount.

    We will impose ‘sunset clauses’ on regulations and regulators to ensure
    that the need for each regulation is regularly reviewed.

    We will find a practical way to make small business rate relief automatic.

    We will seek to ensure an injection of private capital into Royal Mail,
    including opportunities for employee ownership. We will retain Post Office
    Ltd in public ownership.

    We will seek to ensure a level playing field between small and large
    retailers by enabling councils to take competition issues into account
    when drawing up their local plans to shape the direction and type of new
    retail development.

    We will review the range of factors that can be considered by regulators
    when takeovers are proposed.

    We will reinstate an Operating and Financial Review to ensure that
    directors’ social and environmental duties have to be covered in company
    reporting, and investigate further ways of improving corporate
    accountability and transparency.

    We will ensure that Post Offices are allowed to offer a wide range of
    services in order to sustain the network, and we will look at the case for
    developing new sources of revenue, such as the creation of a Post Office
    Bank.

    We will end the so-called ‘gold-plating’ of EU rules, so that British
    businesses are not disadvantaged relative to their European competitors.

    We will introduce a Freedom Bill.

    We will scrap the ID card scheme, the National Identity register and the
    ContactPoint database, and halt the next generation of biometric passports.

    We will outlaw the finger-printing of children at school without parental
    permission.

    We will extend the scope of the Freedom of Information Act to provide
    greater transparency.

    We will protect historic freedoms through the defence of trial by jury.

    We will restore rights to non-violent protest.

    We will end the storage of internet and email records without good reason.

    We will introduce a new mechanism to prevent the proliferation of
    unnecessary new criminal offences.

    We will abolish the unelected Infrastructure Planning Commission and
    replace it with an efficient and democratically accountable system that
    provides a fast-track process for major infrastructure projects.

    We will maintain the Green Belt, Sites of Special Scientific Interest
    (SSSIs) and other environmental protections, and create a new designation
    – similar to SSSIs – to protect green areas of particular importance to
    local communities.

    We will explore a range of measures to bring empty homes into use.

    We will promote ‘Home on the Farm’ schemes that encourage farmers to
    convert existing buildings into affordable housing.

    We will phase out the ring-fencing of grants to local government and
    review the unfair Housing Revenue Account.

    We will require continuous improvements to the energy efficiency of new
    housing.

    We will introduce stronger consumer protections, including measures to end
    unfair bank and financial transaction charges.

    We will take forward measures to enhance customer service in the private
    and public sectors.

    We will increase households’ control over their energy costs by ensuring
    that energy bills provide information on how to move to the cheapest
    tariff offered by their supplier, and how each household’s energy usage
    compares to similar households.

    We will seek to extend protection and support to ‘off-grid’ energy
    consumers.

    We will seek to spread information on which policing techniques and
    sentences are most effective at cutting crime across the Criminal Justice
    System.

    We will have a full review of the terms and conditions for police officer
    employment.

    We will make hospitals share non-confidential information with the police
    so they know where gun and knife crime is happening and can target
    stop-and-search in gun and knife crime hot spots.

    We will promote better recording of hate crimes against disabled,
    homosexual and transgender people, which are frequently not centrally
    recorded.

    We will review the operation of the Extradition Act – and the US/UK
    extradition treaty – to make sure it is even-handed.

    We will maintain the independence of the BBC, and give the National Audit
    Office full access to the BBC’s accounts to ensure transparency.

    We will maintain free entry to national museums and galleries, and give
    national museums greater freedoms.

    We will examine the case for moving to a ‘gross profits tax’ system for
    the National Lottery, and reform the National Lottery so that more money
    goes into sport, the arts and heritage.

    We will use cash in dormant betting accounts to improve local sports
    facilities and support sports clubs.

    We will cut red tape to encourage the performance of more live music.

    We will look at whether there is scope to refurbish Armed Forces’
    accommodation from efficiencies within the Ministry of Defence.

    We will support defence jobs through exports that are used for legitimate
    purposes, not internal repression, and will work for a full international
    ban on cluster munitions.

    We will hold a full Spending Review reporting this autumn, following a
    fully consultative process involving all tiers of government and the
    private sector.

    We will push for the EU to demonstrate leadership in tackling
    international climate change, including by supporting an increase in the
    EU emission reduction target to 30% by 2020.

    We will introduce measures to promote a huge increase in energy from waste
    through anaerobic digestion.

    We will refuse permission for additional runways at Gatwick and Stansted.

    We will replace Air Passenger Duty with a per-flight duty.

    We will work towards an ambitious global climate deal that will limit
    emissions and explore the creation of new international sources of funding
    for the purpose of climate change adaptation and mitigation.

    We will work towards full compliance with European Air Quality standards.

    We will investigate measures to help with fuel costs in remote rural
    areas, starting with pilot schemes.

    We will extend the right to request flexible working to all employees,
    consulting with business on how best to do so.

    We will undertake a fair pay review in the public sector to implement our
    proposed ‘20 times’ pay multiple.

    We will press for the European Parliament to have only one seat, in
    Brussels.

    We will maintain the goal of ending child poverty in the UK by 2020.

    We will reform the administration of tax credits to reduce fraud and
    overpayments.

    We will publish serious case reviews, with identifying details removed.

    We will regulate lobbying through introducing a statutory register of
    lobbyists and ensuring greater transparency.

    We will end the detention of children for immigration purposes.

    We support E-borders and will reintroduce exit checks.

    We will explore new ways to improve the current asylum system to speed up
    the processing of applications.

    We will support efforts to establish an International Arms Trade Treaty to
    limit the sales of arms to dangerous regimes.

    We will review what action can be taken against ‘vulture funds’.
    We will support reform of global financial institutions such as the World
    Bank and the International Monetary Fund in order to increase the
    involvement of developing nations.

    We will explore alternative forms of secure, treatment-based accommodation
    for mentally ill and drugs offenders.

    We will urgently review Control Orders, as part of a wider review of
    counter-terrorist legislation, measures and programmes. We will seek to
    find a practical way to allow the use of intercept evidence in court.

    We will ensure that there is a stronger voice for patients locally through
    directly elected individuals on the boards of their local primary care
    trust (PCT). The remainder of the PCT’s board will be appointed by the
    relevant local authority or authorities, and the Chief Executive and
    principal officers will be appointed by the Secretary of State on the
    advice of the new independent NHS board. This will ensure the right
    balance between locally accountable individuals and technical expertise.

    We will give every patient the right to choose to register with the GP
    they want, without being restricted by where they live.

    We will make the NHS work better by extending best practice on improving
    discharge from hospital, maximising the number of day care operations,
    reducing delays prior to operations, and where possible enabling community
    access to care and treatments.

    We will prioritise dementia research within the health research and
    development budget.

    We will seek to stop foreign healthcare professionals working in the NHS
    unless they have passed robust language and competence tests.

    Doctors and nurses need to be able to use their professional judgement
    about what is right for patients and we will support this by giving
    front-line staff more control of their working environment.

    We will encourage NHS organisations to work better with their local police
    forces to clamp down on anyone who is aggressive and abusive to staff.

    We will restore the earnings link for the basic state pension from April
    2011, with a ‘triple guarantee’ that pensions are raised by the higher of
    earnings, prices or 2.5%.

    We will commit to establishing an independent commission to review the
    long-term affordability of public sector pensions, while protecting
    accrued rights.

    We will explore the potential to give people greater flexibility in
    accessing part of their personal pension fund early.

    We will establish five-year fixed-term Parliaments. We will put a binding
    motion before the House of Commons stating that the next general election
    will be held on the first Thursday of May 2015. Following this motion, we
    will legislate to make provision for fixed-term Parliaments of five years.
    This legislation will also provide for dissolution if 55% or more of the
    House votes in favour.

    We will bring forward a Referendum Bill on electoral reform, which
    includes provision for the introduction of the Alternative Vote in the
    event of a positive result in the referendum, as well as for the creation
    of fewer and more equal sized constituencies. We will whip both
    Parliamentary parties in both Houses to support a simple majority
    referendum on the Alternative Vote, without prejudice to the positions
    parties will take during such a referendum.

    We will review the control and use of accumulated and future revenues from
    the Fossil Fuel Levy in Scotland.

    We will fund a significant premium for disadvantaged pupils from outside
    the schools budget by reductions in spending elsewhere.

    We will help schools tackle bullying in schools, especially homophobic
    bullying.
    We will simplify the regulation of standards in education and target
    inspection on areas of failure.

    We will ensure that all new Academies follow an inclusive admissions
    policy. We will work with faith groups to enable more faith schools and
    facilitate inclusive admissions policies in as many of these schools as
    possible.

    We will reform Access to Work, so disabled people can apply for jobs with
    funding already secured for any adaptations and equipment they will need.

    We will increase the personal allowance for income tax to help lower and
    middle income earners. We will announce in the first Budget a substantial
    increase in the personal allowance from April 2011, with the benefits
    focused on those with lower and middle incomes.

    We will further increase the personal allowance to £10,000, making real
    terms steps each year towards meeting this as a longer-term policy
    objective. We will prioritise this over other tax cuts, including cuts to
    Inheritance Tax.

    We will reform the taxation of air travel by switching from a
    per-passenger to a per-plane duty, and will ensure that a proportion of
    any increased revenues over time will be used to help fund increases in
    the personal allowance.

    We will seek ways of taxing non-business capital gains at rates similar or
    close to those applied to income, with generous exemptions for
    entrepreneurial business activities.

    We will make every effort to tackle tax avoidance, including detailed
    development of Liberal Democrat proposals.

    We will review the taxation of non-domiciled individuals.

    We are committed to fair pricing for rail travel.

    We will ensure that public funding mechanisms for university research
    safeguard its academic integrity.